Chili con carne vs Chili con carne
Overall, Chili con carne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chili con carne | Chili con carne |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 160 kcal | 114 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.3 g | 1.1 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 2.8 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 5.2 g | 4 g |
| Protein | 10.7 g | 8.2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chili con carne has 29% fewer calories (114 kcal vs 160 kcal).
- Chili con carne has 19% less fat (4.7 g vs 5.8 g).
- Chili con carne has 52% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 2.3 g).
- Chili con carne has 64% less sugar (1 g vs 2.8 g).
- Chili con carne has 23% more fiber (5.2 g vs 4 g).
- Chili con carne has 23% more protein (10.7 g vs 8.2 g).
- Chili con carne has the better Nutri-Score.
- Chili con carne is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Chili con carne
Haricots rouges cuits 33%, viande de bœuf 25% (origine : France), eau, carottes, concentré de tomates, maïs, amidon de maïs, épices, sel, ail poudre
Chili con carne
Agua, carne de vacuno (26%) (carne de vacuno (20%) y corazón de vacuno), alubias (23%), cebolla, tomate, pimiento, zanahoria, almidón, aceite de girasol, pimentón, aromas, sal, azúcar, especias, vinagre de vino y ajo,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chili con carne or Chili con carne?
Overall, Chili con carne has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chili con carne has fewer calories: 114 kcal versus 160 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chili con carne has less sugar: 1 g versus 2.8 g per 100 g.