Comparison

Chewing gum pure fresh vs Chicles hierbabuena

Overall, Chicles hierbabuena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientChewing gum pure freshChicles hierbabuena
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 294 kcal 259 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.5 g
Additives1613
AllergensSoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Chicles hierbabuena has 12% fewer calories (259 kcal vs 294 kcal).
  • Chewing gum pure fresh has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Chicles hierbabuena has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Chewing gum pure fresh lists: Soybeans.

Ingredients

Chewing gum pure fresh

édulcorants (xylitol (32%), sorbitol, mannitol, sirop de maltitol, aspartame, acésulfame-K), gomme base, stabilisant (glycérol), maltodextrine, arômes, fécule, émulsifiants (sucroesters d'acides gras, lécithines (soja)), épaississant (gomme de cellulose, gomme xanthane), agent d'enrobage (cire de carnauba), huile de noix de coco, antioxydant (E321), colorant (bleu brillant FCF).

Chicles hierbabuena

Edulcorantes (sorbitol, isomalt), goma base (antioxidante (extracto rico en tocoferoles)), edulcorante (jarabe de maltitol), humectante (glicerina), espesante (goma arábiga), edulcorantes (aspartamo, acesulfamo K, sucralosa), agentes de recubrimiento (talco, cera de carnauba).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Chewing gum pure fresh or Chicles hierbabuena?

Overall, Chicles hierbabuena has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Chicles hierbabuena has fewer calories: 259 kcal versus 294 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Chewing gum pure fresh has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons