ChariTea mint vs ICE TEA herbes des alpes
Overall, ChariTea mint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | ChariTea mint | ICE TEA herbes des alpes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 2 kcal | 24 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ChariTea mint has 92% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 24 kcal).
- ChariTea mint has 92% less sugar (0.5 g vs 6 g).
- ChariTea mint has the better Nutri-Score.
- ChariTea mint is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
ChariTea mint
Aufguss aus Bio-Minzteemischung (Wasser, Bio-Apfelstücke, Bio-Apfelminze, Bio-Pfefferminze, Bio-Rooibos, Bio-Zitronenmyrte, Bio-Süßkraut) (98,5%), Bio-Passionsfruchtsaft (1,5%).
ICE TEA herbes des alpes
Infusion de thé noir avec des herbes (dosage de l'extrait sec: 1,5g/1) (mélisse, menthe poivrée, alchémille, camomille, ortie, verveine odorante), sucre, acidifiant: acide citrique
FAQ
Which is healthier: ChariTea mint or ICE TEA herbes des alpes?
Overall, ChariTea mint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ChariTea mint has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 24 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
ChariTea mint has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 6 g per 100 g.