Bio ice tea menthe vs ChariTea mint
Overall, ChariTea mint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Bio ice tea menthe | ChariTea mint |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 2 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- ChariTea mint has 93% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 28 kcal).
- ChariTea mint has no fat, while Bio ice tea menthe has 0.5 g.
- ChariTea mint has 93% less sugar (0.5 g vs 6.9 g).
- Bio ice tea menthe has 100% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- ChariTea mint has the better Nutri-Score.
- ChariTea mint is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bio ice tea menthe
infusion de menthe (eau, menthe), sucre, jus de citron concentré
ChariTea mint
Aufguss aus Bio-Minzteemischung (Wasser, Bio-Apfelstücke, Bio-Apfelminze, Bio-Pfefferminze, Bio-Rooibos, Bio-Zitronenmyrte, Bio-Süßkraut) (98,5%), Bio-Passionsfruchtsaft (1,5%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio ice tea menthe or ChariTea mint?
Overall, ChariTea mint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
ChariTea mint has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
ChariTea mint has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 6.9 g per 100 g.