Champignons de Paris entiers vs Champignons, 1. Wahl
Overall, Champignons, 1. Wahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Champignons de Paris entiers
Champignons, 1. Wahl
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champignons de Paris entiers | Champignons, 1. Wahl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 18 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0.4 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | — | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.7 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champignons, 1. Wahl has 26% more protein (2.3 g vs 1.7 g).
Ingredients
Champignons de Paris entiers
Champignons de Paris, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Champignons, 1. Wahl
Champignons, Wasser, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champignons de Paris entiers or Champignons, 1. Wahl?
Overall, Champignons, 1. Wahl has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champignons de Paris entiers has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champignons de Paris entiers has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.