Champignons de Paris entiers vs Champignons, 1. Wahl
Overall, Champignons de Paris entiers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champignons de Paris entiers | Champignons, 1. Wahl |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 19 kcal | 20 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 2.2 g | 2.3 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champignons de Paris entiers has no fat, while Champignons, 1. Wahl has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Champignons de Paris entiers
Champignons de Paris, eau, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique.
Champignons, 1. Wahl
Champignons, Wasser, Speisesalz, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champignons de Paris entiers or Champignons, 1. Wahl?
Overall, Champignons de Paris entiers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champignons de Paris entiers has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 20 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champignons de Paris entiers has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.