Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut vs Stolzenfels Sekt trocken
Overall, Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champagne Charles Lafitte Be... | Stolzenfels Sekt trocken |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 9 kcal | 12 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 2.1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut has no sugar, while Stolzenfels Sekt trocken has 2.1 g.
- Only Stolzenfels Sekt trocken lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut
Champagne
Stolzenfels Sekt trocken
Trauben, Fülldosage, Versanddosage, Stabilisatoren: enthält Citronensäure und/oder Hefe-Mannoproteine und/oder Metaweinsäure, Säureregulatoren: enthält Weinsäure (L(+)-) und/oder Apfelsäure (D,L-; L-), Konservierungsstoffe: Sulfite, Antioxidationsmittel: L-Ascorbinsäure.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut or Stolzenfels Sekt trocken?
Overall, Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut has fewer calories: 9 kcal versus 12 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut has less sugar: 0 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.