Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut vs Champagne brut classique
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champagne Charles Lafitte Be... | Champagne brut classique |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 9 kcal | 12 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut has no sugar, while Champagne brut classique has 1.4 g.
- Champagne brut classique has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Only Champagne brut classique lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut
Champagne
Champagne brut classique
Champagne brut (contient des _sulfites_)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut or Champagne brut classique?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut has fewer calories: 9 kcal versus 12 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Champagne Charles Lafitte Belle Cuvée Brut has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.