Comparison
Champagne Brut vs Nicolas Feuillatte
Overall, Nicolas Feuillatte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champagne Brut | Nicolas Feuillatte |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 12 kcal | 6 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 1.4 g | 0.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Nicolas Feuillatte has 50% fewer calories (6 kcal vs 12 kcal).
- Nicolas Feuillatte has 36% less sugar (0.9 g vs 1.4 g).
- Champagne Brut has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
Ingredients
Champagne Brut
Champagne, contient des _sulfites_.
Nicolas Feuillatte
Champagne, Contient des _sulfites_
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champagne Brut or Nicolas Feuillatte?
Overall, Nicolas Feuillatte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Nicolas Feuillatte has fewer calories: 6 kcal versus 12 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Nicolas Feuillatte has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1.4 g per 100 g.