Comparison
Champagne AOP brut vs Tsarine
Overall, Tsarine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Champagne AOP brut | Tsarine |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 82 kcal | 12 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 12 g | 1.4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tsarine has 85% fewer calories (12 kcal vs 82 kcal).
- Tsarine has 88% less sugar (1.4 g vs 12 g).
- Only Tsarine lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Champagne AOP brut
Champagne
Tsarine
Champagne brut (contient des _sulfites_)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Champagne AOP brut or Tsarine?
Overall, Tsarine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tsarine has fewer calories: 12 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tsarine has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 12 g per 100 g.