Comparison

Cervelas 400g - massif trad vs Saucisson a l'ail fume 300g

Overall, Cervelas 400g - massif trad has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCervelas 400g - massif tradSaucisson a l'ail fume 300g
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 246 kcal 262 kcal
Fat 22 g 21 g
Saturated fat 7.8 g 7.6 g
Sugars 0.5 g 1.1 g
Salt 2 g 2.2 g
Fiber 0.5 g 0 g
Protein 14 g 15 g
Additives73
AllergensMilk, Mustard, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesMilk, Mustard

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Cervelas 400g - massif trad has 55% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Cervelas 400g - massif trad has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Cervelas 400g - massif trad lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Cervelas 400g - massif trad

Viande de porc (71%), eau, dextrose, protéines de lait, sel, stabilisants : polyphosphates ; arômes, acidifiant : acétate de sodium ; épices et aromates ; conservateurs : ascorbate de sodium, nitrite de sodium ; exhausteur de goût : glutamate de sodium ; colorant : carmins.

Saucisson a l'ail fume 300g

Viande de porc (origine : France),eau, plasma de porc, sel, farine de moutarde,sirop de glucose, dextrose, ail déshydraté (0.55%), stabilisants :triphosphates ; ; protéines de lait,antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium ; ; conservateur : nitrite de sodium. Porc :84%.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cervelas 400g - massif trad or Saucisson a l'ail fume 300g?

Overall, Cervelas 400g - massif trad has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cervelas 400g - massif trad has fewer calories: 246 kcal versus 262 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Cervelas 400g - massif trad has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons