Caviar d'Aquitaine vs Schenkels Nordischer Caviar
Overall, Caviar d'Aquitaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caviar d'Aquitaine | Schenkels Nordischer Caviar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 140 kcal | 85 kcal |
| Fat | 9.8 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.6 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 12.7 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 5 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Schenkels Nordischer Caviar has 39% fewer calories (85 kcal vs 140 kcal).
- Schenkels Nordischer Caviar has 54% less fat (4.5 g vs 9.8 g).
- Schenkels Nordischer Caviar has 62% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.6 g).
- Caviar d'Aquitaine has no salt, while Schenkels Nordischer Caviar has 6 g.
- Caviar d'Aquitaine has 21% more protein (12.7 g vs 10 g).
- Caviar d'Aquitaine has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Caviar d'Aquitaine
Not available.
Schenkels Nordischer Caviar
SEEHASENROGEN** (Cyclopterus lumpus), Speisesalz, Konservierungsstoff: E211, Farbstoffe: E150d, E151, E110*, Säuerungsmittel E330. *Kann Aktivität und Aufmerksamkeit bei Kindern beeinträchtigen. **Gefangen im Nordostatlantik (FAO 27) mit Umschließungsnetzen. Unterbereich Va2. Nach dem Öffnen gekühlt lagern und innerhalb von 10 Tagen aufbrauchen. Netto 50 g e
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caviar d'Aquitaine or Schenkels Nordischer Caviar?
Overall, Caviar d'Aquitaine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Schenkels Nordischer Caviar has fewer calories: 85 kcal versus 140 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Schenkels Nordischer Caviar has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.3 g per 100 g.