Cassis vs Cassis
Overall, Cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Cassis | Cassis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 28 kcal | 4 kcal |
| Fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 6.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassis has 86% fewer calories (4 kcal vs 28 kcal).
- Cassis has 92% less sugar (0.5 g vs 6.5 g).
- Cassis has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Cassis
Zwarte bessensap uit concentraat (3%), gefermenteerd zwarte bes (voedingszuur (citroenzuur), aroma, kleurend concentraat (zwarte bes wel), zoetstof (cyclamaten, acesulfaam-K, sucralose),
Cassis
Koolzuurhoudend water, zwartebessensap uit concentraat 5%, gefermenteerd zwarte bessensap uit concentraat 2,4%, voedings - zuur: citroenzuur, aroma, zoetstoffen: cyclamaten, acesulfaam-K, aspartaam'en sacharinen, conserveermiddel: E202. "Bevat een bron van fenylalanine.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassis or Cassis?
Overall, Cassis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassis has fewer calories: 4 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassis has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.