Caramel au beurre salé au sel de Guérande , 220g vs Caramel beurre salé
Overall, Caramel beurre salé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Caramel au beurre salé au sel de Guérande , 220g
Caramel beurre salé
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caramel au beurre salé au se... | Caramel beurre salé |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 423 kcal | 389 kcal |
| Fat | 21 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 6 g |
| Sugars | 58 g | 46 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 1.1 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caramel beurre salé has 29% less fat (15 g vs 21 g).
- Caramel beurre salé has 57% less saturated fat (6 g vs 14 g).
- Caramel beurre salé has 21% less sugar (46 g vs 58 g).
- Caramel beurre salé has 40% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Caramel au beurre salé au sel de Guérande , 220g has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Caramel beurre salé has 45% more protein (2 g vs 1.1 g).
- Caramel au beurre salé au sel de Guérande , 220g is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Caramel au beurre salé au sel de Guérande , 220g
Sucre, crème, eau, beurre 3,2%, sel de Guérande 1,28%.
Caramel beurre salé
Sucre, sirop de glucose, lait concentré sucré (lait entier, sucre), crème (lait), beurre salé (beurre, sel) 10%, caramel (sucre, eau,sel)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caramel au beurre salé au sel de Guérande , 220g or Caramel beurre salé?
Overall, Caramel beurre salé has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caramel beurre salé has fewer calories: 389 kcal versus 423 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caramel beurre salé has less sugar: 46 g versus 58 g per 100 g.