Caramel à tartiner 330g vs Caramelo Liquido
Overall, Caramelo Liquido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Caramel à tartiner 330g | Caramelo Liquido |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 365 kcal | 290 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.5 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 47 g | 40.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 2.9 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Caramelo Liquido has 21% fewer calories (290 kcal vs 365 kcal).
- Caramelo Liquido has no fat, while Caramel à tartiner 330g has 13 g.
- Caramelo Liquido has no saturated fat, while Caramel à tartiner 330g has 8.5 g.
- Caramelo Liquido has 14% less sugar (40.5 g vs 47 g).
- Caramelo Liquido has no salt, while Caramel à tartiner 330g has 1 g.
- Caramel à tartiner 330g has 100% more fiber (1 g vs 0 g).
- Caramel à tartiner 330g has 100% more protein (2.9 g vs 0 g).
- Only Caramel à tartiner 330g lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Caramel à tartiner 330g
LAIT concentré sucré (LAIT entier, sucre), sirop de glucose, BEURRE salé 12% (BEURRE, sel), sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, eau, correcteur d'acidité : citrate de sodium, gélifiant : pectine de fruits, sel, émulsifiant : lécithine de tournesol. traces éventuelles de soja
Caramelo Liquido
glucose syrup, sugar, water, preservative (e202)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Caramel à tartiner 330g or Caramelo Liquido?
Overall, Caramelo Liquido has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Caramelo Liquido has fewer calories: 290 kcal versus 365 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Caramelo Liquido has less sugar: 40.5 g versus 47 g per 100 g.