Comparison

Carajos de cordero vs Carne picada pollo

Overall, Carajos de cordero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCarajos de corderoCarne picada pollo
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 153 kcal 146 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 8 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.4 g
Protein 30.4 g 16 g
Additives10
AllergensAjoNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carajos de cordero has 56% less fat (3.5 g vs 8 g).
  • Carajos de cordero has 51% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 3 g).
  • Carajos de cordero has 47% more protein (30.4 g vs 16 g).
  • Only Carajos de cordero lists: Ajo.

Ingredients

Carajos de cordero

tripa de cordero, sal, _ajo_, antioxidante E330.

Carne picada pollo

carne de pollo,agua,almidón de patata y maíz,fibras vegetales,hortalizas deshidratadas tomate,dextrosa,sal,conservador sulfito sódico,antioxidante ascorbato sódico,proteína de guisante y colorante carmín cochinilla

FAQ

Which is healthier: Carajos de cordero or Carne picada pollo?

Overall, Carajos de cordero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carne picada pollo has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Carajos de cordero has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons