Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style vs Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla
Overall, Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style
Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate S... | Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 401 kcal | 408 kcal |
| Fat | 6.9 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.9 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 52 g | 54 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 7.8 g | 8.6 g |
| Additives | 5 | 5 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style has 40% less salt (0.6 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style
Sucre, sirop de glucose, poudre de lait écrémé, maltodextrine, huile de palmiste, café instantané (5,6 %), amidon modifié, arômes (lait), anti-agglomérant (E551), protéines de lait, stabilisant (E340), épaississant (E415), émulsifiant (E481).
Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla
Zucker, Magermilchpulver (21%), Glukosesirup, Maltodextrin, Palmkernöl, Matcha Pulver (3%), modifizierte Stärke, Salz, Trennmittel (E551), Milcheiweiß, Stabilisator (E340), Verdickungsmittel (E415), Emulgator (E481). Hergestellt in Tschechien. Zutaten aus der EU/Nicht-EU
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style or Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla?
Overall, Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style has fewer calories: 401 kcal versus 408 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cappuccino Dubai Chocolate Style has less sugar: 52 g versus 54 g per 100 g.