Salted caramel mocha vs Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Salted caramel mocha | Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 408 kcal | 408 kcal |
| Fat | 10.1 g | 6.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 8.5 g | 6.3 g |
| Sugars | 44.6 g | 54 g |
| Salt | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 3.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Protein | 9.2 g | 8.6 g |
| Additives | 3 | 5 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla has 37% less fat (6.4 g vs 10.1 g).
- Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla has 26% less saturated fat (6.3 g vs 8.5 g).
- Salted caramel mocha has 17% less sugar (44.6 g vs 54 g).
- Salted caramel mocha has 58% more fiber (3.3 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Salted caramel mocha
Glucosestroop, magere melkpoeder (21,6%), suiker, magere gesuikerde huishoudcacao (11,6%) (suiker, magere cacaopoeder (25%)), kokosolie, koffie (6,7%) (instantkoffie (6,2%) gebrande gemalen koffie), lactose, natuurlijk aroma, zuurteregelaars (natriumbicarbonaat, citroenzuur), zout.
Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla
Zucker, Magermilchpulver (21%), Glukosesirup, Maltodextrin, Palmkernöl, Matcha Pulver (3%), modifizierte Stärke, Salz, Trennmittel (E551), Milcheiweiß, Stabilisator (E340), Verdickungsmittel (E415), Emulgator (E481). Hergestellt in Tschechien. Zutaten aus der EU/Nicht-EU
FAQ
Which is healthier: Salted caramel mocha or Jacobs Typ Matcha Latte Typ Vanilla?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Salted caramel mocha has fewer calories: 408 kcal versus 408 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salted caramel mocha has less sugar: 44.6 g versus 54 g per 100 g.