Comparison
Cannelloni vs Cannelloni
Overall, Cannelloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cannelloni | Cannelloni |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 356 kcal | 360 kcal |
| Fat | 1.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 3 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.9 g |
| Protein | 12 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cannelloni has 50% less sugar (1.5 g vs 3 g).
- Only Cannelloni lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Cannelloni
Not available.
Cannelloni
Harina de _trigo_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cannelloni or Cannelloni?
Overall, Cannelloni has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cannelloni has fewer calories: 356 kcal versus 360 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cannelloni has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 3 g per 100 g.