Cannelés au saumon fumé et à l’aneth vs 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux
Overall, 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Cannelés au saumon fumé et à l’aneth
Better choice
4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cannelés au saumon fumé et à... | 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 300 kcal | 285 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 3 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.8 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 6.7 g | 42 g |
| Salt | 1.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 9.6 g | 3.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux has 84% less fat (3 g vs 19 g).
- 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux has 42% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 3.8 g).
- Cannelés au saumon fumé et à l’aneth has 84% less sugar (6.7 g vs 42 g).
- 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux has 91% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.4 g).
- Cannelés au saumon fumé et à l’aneth has 64% more protein (9.6 g vs 3.5 g).
- Only 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk.
Ingredients
Cannelés au saumon fumé et à l’aneth
Not available.
4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux
eau, sucre, farine de blé, rhum, préparation lactée (lactosérum, matière grasse végétale (coprah), protéines de lait) lait écrémé), poudre d’œufs entiers, arôme vanille.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cannelés au saumon fumé et à l’aneth or 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux?
Overall, 4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
4 x 6 Canelés de Bordeaux has fewer calories: 285 kcal versus 300 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cannelés au saumon fumé et à l’aneth has less sugar: 6.7 g versus 42 g per 100 g.