Comparison

Canestrelli - Dolcetti di Pasta Frolla vs Canestrelli al riso

Overall, Canestrelli al riso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCanestrelli - Dolcetti di Pa...Canestrelli al riso
Nutri-Score e d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 520 kcal 461 kcal
Fat 27 g 16 g
Saturated fat 16 g 1.9 g
Sugars 18 g 20 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.7 g
Fiber — 1.1 g
Protein 6.5 g 4 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedNone

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Canestrelli al riso has 11% fewer calories (461 kcal vs 520 kcal).
  • Canestrelli al riso has 41% less fat (16 g vs 27 g).
  • Canestrelli al riso has 88% less saturated fat (1.9 g vs 16 g).
  • Canestrelli - Dolcetti di Pasta Frolla has 10% less sugar (18 g vs 20 g).
  • Canestrelli - Dolcetti di Pasta Frolla has 82% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Canestrelli - Dolcetti di Pasta Frolla has 38% more protein (6.5 g vs 4 g).
  • Canestrelli al riso has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Canestrelli al riso lists: None.

Ingredients

Canestrelli - Dolcetti di Pasta Frolla

Not available.

Canestrelli al riso

miscela (farina di riso 54%, amido di mais, farina di lino, farina di pisello, agenti lievitanti (bicarbonato di ammonio, bicarbonato di sodio), sale, antiossidante (tocoferolo)), zucchero, olio di semi di girasole, farina di riso 10%, aromi, emulsionante (lecitina di girasole).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Canestrelli - Dolcetti di Pasta Frolla or Canestrelli al riso?

Overall, Canestrelli al riso has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Canestrelli al riso has fewer calories: 461 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Canestrelli - Dolcetti di Pasta Frolla has less sugar: 18 g versus 20 g per 100 g.

More comparisons