Comparison
Camden Pale Ale vs Non Ipa
Overall, Camden Pale Ale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Camden Pale Ale | Non Ipa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 24 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 3.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Non Ipa has 35% fewer calories (24 kcal vs 37 kcal).
- Camden Pale Ale has no fat, while Non Ipa has 0.5 g.
- Camden Pale Ale has 87% less sugar (0.5 g vs 3.8 g).
- Only Camden Pale Ale lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Camden Pale Ale
Water, _malted barley_, _wheat_, hops, yeast
Non Ipa
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Camden Pale Ale or Non Ipa?
Overall, Camden Pale Ale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Non Ipa has fewer calories: 24 kcal versus 37 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Camden Pale Ale has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 3.8 g per 100 g.