Comparison

Calendrier ours vs Calendrier de l’avent toblerone

Overall, Calendrier de l’avent toblerone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCalendrier oursCalendrier de l’avent tobler...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 606 kcal 527 kcal
Fat 43 g 29 g
Saturated fat 30 g 17 g
Sugars 47 g 57 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.2 g
Fiber — 3.5 g
Protein 5.3 g 5.9 g
Additives22
AllergensMilk, SoybeansEggs, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Calendrier de l’avent toblerone has 13% fewer calories (527 kcal vs 606 kcal).
  • Calendrier de l’avent toblerone has 33% less fat (29 g vs 43 g).
  • Calendrier de l’avent toblerone has 43% less saturated fat (17 g vs 30 g).
  • Calendrier ours has 18% less sugar (47 g vs 57 g).
  • Calendrier de l’avent toblerone has 10% more protein (5.9 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Only Calendrier de l’avent toblerone lists: Eggs, Nuts.

Ingredients

Calendrier ours

sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, matières grasses végétales (coprah, palme), pâte de cacao, lactose, beurre laitier concentré, poudre de lait écrémé, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), extrait de mal d'orge, arômes, sel

Calendrier de l’avent toblerone

Sucre, pâte de cacao, lait entier en poudre, beurre de cacao, miel (3%), amandes (2,5%), beurre concentré, émulsifiant (lécithines de soja), sel, blanc d’œuf, arôme. Cacao: 28%

FAQ

Which is healthier: Calendrier ours or Calendrier de l’avent toblerone?

Overall, Calendrier de l’avent toblerone has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Calendrier de l’avent toblerone has fewer calories: 527 kcal versus 606 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Calendrier ours has less sugar: 47 g versus 57 g per 100 g.

More comparisons