Calendrier ours vs Calendrier de l’Avent
Overall, Calendrier de l’Avent has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Calendrier ours | Calendrier de l’Avent |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 606 kcal | 552 kcal |
| Fat | 43 g | 34.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 30 g | 22.6 g |
| Sugars | 47 g | 52.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Protein | 5.3 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Soybeans | Milk, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Calendrier de l’Avent has 20% less fat (34.2 g vs 43 g).
- Calendrier de l’Avent has 25% less saturated fat (22.6 g vs 30 g).
- Calendrier de l’Avent has 35% more protein (8.1 g vs 5.3 g).
- Only Calendrier de l’Avent lists: Nuts.
Ingredients
Calendrier ours
sucre, beurre de cacao, poudre de lait, matières grasses végétales (coprah, palme), pâte de cacao, lactose, beurre laitier concentré, poudre de lait écrémé, émulsifiant (lécithine de soja), extrait de mal d'orge, arômes, sel
Calendrier de l’Avent
نا
FAQ
Which is healthier: Calendrier ours or Calendrier de l’Avent?
Overall, Calendrier de l’Avent has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Calendrier de l’Avent has fewer calories: 552 kcal versus 606 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Calendrier ours has less sugar: 47 g versus 52.1 g per 100 g.