Comparison

Buttons Coco Mylk vs Dairy Milk buttons mint

Overall, Dairy Milk buttons mint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientButtons Coco MylkDairy Milk buttons mint
Nutri-Score e —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 599 kcal 532 kcal
Fat 46 g 30.4 g
Saturated fat 32 g 17.6 g
Sugars 34 g 56 g
Salt 0.1 g —
Fiber — 2 g
Protein 6.3 g 7.2 g
Additives02
AllergensNone listedMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Dairy Milk buttons mint has 11% fewer calories (532 kcal vs 599 kcal).
  • Dairy Milk buttons mint has 34% less fat (30.4 g vs 46 g).
  • Dairy Milk buttons mint has 45% less saturated fat (17.6 g vs 32 g).
  • Buttons Coco Mylk has 39% less sugar (34 g vs 56 g).
  • Dairy Milk buttons mint has 13% more protein (7.2 g vs 6.3 g).
  • Only Dairy Milk buttons mint lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Buttons Coco Mylk

Unroasted Cacao*, Coconut Sugar*, Creamed Coconut* (20%), Cocoa Butter**, Vanilla Extract*, Live Culture: Lactobacillus Acidophilus. *Certified organic. *Fair trade certified according to the Fair for Life standard (46%). Cocoa Solids 55% Minimum. ALLERGY ADVICE: MAY ALSO CONTAIN NUTS. Packed in a compostable and biodegradable bag. GB-ORG-04 EU/non-EU Agriculture TUV OK compost AUSTRIA HOME 60370

Dairy Milk buttons mint

Milk**, sugar, cocoa butter, cocoa mass, vegetable fats (palm, shea), emulsifiers (E442, E476), peppermint oil, flavourings.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Buttons Coco Mylk or Dairy Milk buttons mint?

Overall, Dairy Milk buttons mint has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Dairy Milk buttons mint has fewer calories: 532 kcal versus 599 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Buttons Coco Mylk has less sugar: 34 g versus 56 g per 100 g.

More comparisons