Comparison

Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons vs Buttons Coco Mylk

Overall, Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBelgian Plain Chocolate Butt...Buttons Coco Mylk
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group — —
Calories 510 kcal 599 kcal
Fat 36.8 g 46 g
Saturated fat 21.9 g 32 g
Sugars 43 g 34 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.1 g
Fiber 10.3 g —
Protein 4.8 g 6.3 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons has 15% fewer calories (510 kcal vs 599 kcal).
  • Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons has 20% less fat (36.8 g vs 46 g).
  • Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons has 32% less saturated fat (21.9 g vs 32 g).
  • Buttons Coco Mylk has 21% less sugar (34 g vs 43 g).
  • Buttons Coco Mylk has 24% more protein (6.3 g vs 4.8 g).

Ingredients

Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons

Not available.

Buttons Coco Mylk

Unroasted Cacao*, Coconut Sugar*, Creamed Coconut* (20%), Cocoa Butter**, Vanilla Extract*, Live Culture: Lactobacillus Acidophilus. *Certified organic. *Fair trade certified according to the Fair for Life standard (46%). Cocoa Solids 55% Minimum. ALLERGY ADVICE: MAY ALSO CONTAIN NUTS. Packed in a compostable and biodegradable bag. GB-ORG-04 EU/non-EU Agriculture TUV OK compost AUSTRIA HOME 60370

FAQ

Which is healthier: Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons or Buttons Coco Mylk?

Overall, Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Belgian Plain Chocolate Buttons has fewer calories: 510 kcal versus 599 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Buttons Coco Mylk has less sugar: 34 g versus 43 g per 100 g.

More comparisons