Comparison

Butterscotch Hazelnuts vs Haselnuss Krokant

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientButterscotch HazelnutsHaselnuss Krokant
Nutri-Score — e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 567 kcal 455 kcal
Fat 43.3 g 13 g
Saturated fat 20 g 1 g
Sugars 43.3 g 79 g
Salt — 0 g
Fiber 3.3 g 2.4 g
Protein 6.7 g 3 g
Additives20
AllergensMilk, NutsNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Haselnuss Krokant has 20% fewer calories (455 kcal vs 567 kcal).
  • Haselnuss Krokant has 70% less fat (13 g vs 43.3 g).
  • Haselnuss Krokant has 95% less saturated fat (1 g vs 20 g).
  • Butterscotch Hazelnuts has 45% less sugar (43.3 g vs 79 g).
  • Butterscotch Hazelnuts has 29% more fiber (3.3 g vs 2.4 g).
  • Butterscotch Hazelnuts has 55% more protein (6.7 g vs 3 g).
  • Only Butterscotch Hazelnuts lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Butterscotch Hazelnuts

Coating (sugar, RSPO palm kernel oil, RSPO palm oil, cocoa butter, whey, nonfat milk, cream, sunflower lecithin, natural vanilla extract), Hazelnuts, Natural Flavor, Color from Vegetable Juices, Annatto Extract, Confectioners Glaze.

Haselnuss Krokant

Zucker, 20% Haselnüsse, Glukose-Fruktose-Sirup.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Butterscotch Hazelnuts or Haselnuss Krokant?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Haselnuss Krokant has fewer calories: 455 kcal versus 567 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Butterscotch Hazelnuts has less sugar: 43.3 g versus 79 g per 100 g.

More comparisons