Comparison

Burn elite vs Collagen skin care, fruit taste

Overall, Burn elite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBurn eliteCollagen skin care, fruit ta...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 0 kcal 348 kcal
Fat 0 g 1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0 g 1.5 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber 0 g 0.4 g
Protein 0 g 47 g
Additives22
AllergensEggs, Fish, Gelatin, NutsFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Burn elite has no calories, while Collagen skin care, fruit taste has 348 kcal.
  • Burn elite has no fat, while Collagen skin care, fruit taste has 1 g.
  • Burn elite has no sugar, while Collagen skin care, fruit taste has 1.5 g.
  • Collagen skin care, fruit taste has 100% more fiber (0.4 g vs 0 g).
  • Collagen skin care, fruit taste has 100% more protein (47 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Burn elite lists: Eggs, Gelatin, Nuts.

Ingredients

Burn elite

Gelatin (Capsule), Magnesium Stearate, Silicon Dioxide Allergens: Contains Fish, Egg, and Tree Nuts (Coconut) Contains 119 mg of Caffeine Per Serving

Collagen skin care, fruit taste

Naticol (collagen peptide (fish) powder (50%) Maltodextrin, MSM (Methyl sulphonyl methane) powder, Ashwagandha (Withania Somnifera (L) Dure root) powder, strawberry flavour, stabilizer: cellulose, Vitamin C (ascorbic acid), red beet concentrate maltodextrin, red beet powder (Beta vulgaris)], sweetener: steviol glycosides from stevia.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Burn elite or Collagen skin care, fruit taste?

Overall, Burn elite has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Burn elite has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 348 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Burn elite has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons