Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) vs Burger charolais sauce bbq
Overall, Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 3.
Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan)
Burger charolais sauce bbq
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Burger King Impossible Whopp... | Burger charolais sauce bbq |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 236 kcal |
| Fat | 8.6 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 4.6 g |
| Sugars | 3.2 g | 4.6 g |
| Salt | — | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 9.7 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | Soybeans | Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Nuts, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 20% fewer calories (190 kcal vs 236 kcal).
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 14% less fat (8.6 g vs 10 g).
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 65% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 4.6 g).
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 30% less sugar (3.2 g vs 4.6 g).
- Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has 55% more fiber (3.6 g vs 1.6 g).
- Burger charolais sauce bbq has 19% more protein (12 g vs 9.7 g).
- Burger charolais sauce bbq has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Burger charolais sauce bbq lists: Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard, Nuts.
Ingredients
Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan)
water, soy protein concentrate, coconut oil, sunflower oil, natural flavors, 2% or less of: potato protein, methylcellulose, yeast extract, cultured dextrose, food starch modified, soy leghemoglobin, salt, soy protein isolate, mixed tocopherols (vitamin e), zinc gluconate, thiamine hydrochloride (vitamin b1), sodium ascorbate (vitamin c), niacin, pyridoxine hydrochloride (vitamin b6), riboflavin (vitamin b2), vitamin b12
Burger charolais sauce bbq
pain spécial 40% (farine de blé, eau, sucre, levure boulangère, huile de colza, conservateur : propionate de calcium, levure boulangère désactivée, émulsifiants mono - : L. - monoacétyltartriques et diacétyltartriques des mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras, agent de ascorbique), steak haché de viande bovine française de race charolaise cuit35%, sauce vinaigre d'alcool, sirop de glucose, amidon transformé, sel, colorant : caramel ordinaire, arôme de fumée, le potassium, épices), cheddar 5% (lait de vache pasteurisé, selt ferments lactiques, coagulant, li-séchées marinées 5% (tomates, huile de colza, sel, ail, origan), oignons rouges grillés naigre d'alcool, sel, agent raffermisseur : chlorure de calcium, conservateur disulfite de ésence éventue//e de crustacés, œuf, poisson, soja, moutarde et fruits à coque.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) or Burger charolais sauce bbq?
Overall, Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has fewer calories: 190 kcal versus 236 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Burger King Impossible Whopper (Vegan) has less sugar: 3.2 g versus 4.6 g per 100 g.