Comparison
Bryndza plnotučná 48 % vs Bryndza
Overall, Bryndza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bryndza plnotučná 48 % | Bryndza |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 280 kcal |
| Fat | 23 g | 22.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 17 g | 14.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Salt | 2.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 17.7 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bryndza has 12% less saturated fat (14.9 g vs 17 g).
Ingredients
Bryndza plnotučná 48 %
Not available.
Bryndza
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bryndza plnotučná 48 % or Bryndza?
Overall, Bryndza has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bryndza plnotučná 48 % has fewer calories: 270 kcal versus 280 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bryndza has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.