Broskvový kompot vs Melocotón en almíbar
Overall, Melocotón en almíbar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Broskvový kompot | Melocotón en almíbar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 79 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 15 g | 16 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Melocotón en almíbar has no fat, while Broskvový kompot has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Broskvový kompot
Broskve, pitná voda, cukr, kyselina: kyselina citronová.
Melocotón en almíbar
P Metades de pêssego, água, açúcar e acidificante: ácido cítrico. PRODUTO DE ESPANHA. NOONSERVAÇÃO
FAQ
Which is healthier: Broskvový kompot or Melocotón en almíbar?
Overall, Melocotón en almíbar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Melocotón en almíbar has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Broskvový kompot has less sugar: 15 g versus 16 g per 100 g.