Brochettes Abats de Bœuf vs 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf
Overall, 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brochettes Abats de Bœuf | 2 brochettes royal grill boe... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 153 kcal | 86 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 3.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.4 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 13.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf has 44% fewer calories (86 kcal vs 153 kcal).
- 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf has 82% less fat (2 g vs 11 g).
- 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf has 78% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 3.6 g).
- Brochettes Abats de Bœuf has 69% less sugar (0.4 g vs 1.3 g).
- 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf has the better Nutri-Score.
- Brochettes Abats de Bœuf is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Brochettes Abats de Bœuf
COEUR ET ROGNON DE BOEUF ORIGINE FRANCE (67% MINIMUM), POIVRONS, BARDE DE PORC.
2 brochettes royal grill boeuf
Morceaux de cœur de rumsteck (France) 66,4 %, tomate cerise entière 18,5 %, poivron verte en cube 11,5 %, eau, fécule de pomme de terre, sel 0,1 %, fibre de blé (_gluten_).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brochettes Abats de Bœuf or 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf?
Overall, 2 brochettes royal grill boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
2 brochettes royal grill boeuf has fewer calories: 86 kcal versus 153 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brochettes Abats de Bœuf has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.