Comparison
Brillat savarin vs Petit Mont Bebour
Overall, Petit Mont Bebour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brillat savarin | Petit Mont Bebour |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 390 kcal | 346 kcal |
| Fat | 38 g | 30 g |
| Saturated fat | 27 g | 19 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 10 g | 19 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Petit Mont Bebour has 11% fewer calories (346 kcal vs 390 kcal).
- Petit Mont Bebour has 21% less fat (30 g vs 38 g).
- Petit Mont Bebour has 30% less saturated fat (19 g vs 27 g).
- Petit Mont Bebour has no sugar, while Brillat savarin has 1 g.
- Brillat savarin has 25% less salt (1 g vs 1.3 g).
- Petit Mont Bebour has 47% more protein (19 g vs 10 g).
- Only Brillat savarin lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Brillat savarin
LAIT DE VACHE PASTEURISÉ (ORIGINE: FRANCE), CREME (ORIGINE: FRANCE), FERMENTS, SEL, PRESURE
Petit Mont Bebour
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brillat savarin or Petit Mont Bebour?
Overall, Petit Mont Bebour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Petit Mont Bebour has fewer calories: 346 kcal versus 390 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Petit Mont Bebour has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.