Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g vs Bresaola punta d’anca
Overall, Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.
Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g
Bresaola punta d’anca
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g | Bresaola punta d’anca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 161 kcal | 184 kcal |
| Fat | 1.8 g | 3.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 4.1 g | 3.6 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 36 g | 30 g |
| Additives | 2 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has 12% fewer calories (161 kcal vs 184 kcal).
- Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has 49% less fat (1.8 g vs 3.5 g).
- Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has 42% less saturated fat (0.7 g vs 1.2 g).
- Bresaola punta d’anca has 11% less salt (3.6 g vs 4.1 g).
- Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has 17% more protein (36 g vs 30 g).
Ingredients
Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g
Viande bovine (origine : italie), sel, dextrose, arômes naturels, conservateurs : nitrite de sodium et nitrate de potassium. Traces éventuelles de fruits à coque, lait et oeuf.
Bresaola punta d’anca
Carne di bovino, sale, destrosio, aromi naturali, conservanti: (nitrito di sodio, nitrito di potassio)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g or Bresaola punta d’anca?
Overall, Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 184 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bresaola - x10 tranches, 80g has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.