Boulettes Charal Happy Family vs Haché au bœuf
Overall, Boulettes Charal Happy Family has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boulettes Charal Happy Famil... | Haché au bœuf |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 213 kcal | 248 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 20 g |
| Saturated fat | 6.1 g | 7 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 1.1 g |
| Protein | 15 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | Beef | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Boulettes Charal Happy Family has 14% fewer calories (213 kcal vs 248 kcal).
- Boulettes Charal Happy Family has 25% less fat (15 g vs 20 g).
- Boulettes Charal Happy Family has 13% less saturated fat (6.1 g vs 7 g).
- Boulettes Charal Happy Family has no sugar, while Haché au bœuf has 0.5 g.
- Boulettes Charal Happy Family has 32% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- Only Boulettes Charal Happy Family lists: Beef.
Ingredients
Boulettes Charal Happy Family
beef meat 80%, water, bamboo shoot fiber, pea protein 1,7%, potato starch, salt, flavors, dehydrated red beetroot, preservative: e262, antioxidants: e300, e301, e330
Haché au bœuf
Viande bovine française 75%, eau, fibre de bambou, protéines de pois, fécule de pomme de terre, sel, arômes, poudre de betterave rouge, antioxydant : E301. Pourcentage de matières grasses inférieur à 20%.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boulettes Charal Happy Family or Haché au bœuf?
Overall, Boulettes Charal Happy Family has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Boulettes Charal Happy Family has fewer calories: 213 kcal versus 248 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boulettes Charal Happy Family has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.