Comparison

Botifarra vs Carne picada pollo

Overall, Carne picada pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBotifarraCarne picada pollo
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group — —
Calories 200 kcal 146 kcal
Fat 15 g 8 g
Saturated fat 5.7 g 3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1.7 g 0.4 g
Fiber 0.7 g —
Protein 14 g 16 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Carne picada pollo has 27% fewer calories (146 kcal vs 200 kcal).
  • Carne picada pollo has 47% less fat (8 g vs 15 g).
  • Carne picada pollo has 47% less saturated fat (3 g vs 5.7 g).
  • Carne picada pollo has 75% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Carne picada pollo has 13% more protein (16 g vs 14 g).
  • Carne picada pollo has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Botifarra

INFORMACIÓ NUTRICIONAL (PER 100 g): 835/200 Valor energètic (kJ/kcal): Greixos: dels quals, saturats: Hidrats de carboni: 15g 5,7g 1.8g dels quals, sucres: Fibra alimentària: Proteïnes: Sal: Og 0.79 14g 1.7g 2 7 50556|0 0 2376 Fabricat per COMPANYIA GENERAL CARNIA, S.A. Elaborat per RGSEAA: 10.16329/B Longitudinal 7, N°1 MERCABARNA - 08040 Barcelona . 9rnia carnia RECICLA

Carne picada pollo

carne de pollo,agua,almidón de patata y maíz,fibras vegetales,hortalizas deshidratadas tomate,dextrosa,sal,conservador sulfito sódico,antioxidante ascorbato sódico,proteína de guisante y colorante carmín cochinilla

FAQ

Which is healthier: Botifarra or Carne picada pollo?

Overall, Carne picada pollo has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Carne picada pollo has fewer calories: 146 kcal versus 200 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Botifarra has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons