Comparison

Bolognaise vs Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12

Overall, Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBolognaisePz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 82 kcal 50 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 2 g
Saturated fat 1.5 g 0.2 g
Sugars 5.8 g 5.3 g
Salt 0.9 g 0.9 g
Fiber 1.5 g 1.1 g
Protein 4.5 g 1.2 g
Additives10
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12 has 39% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 82 kcal).
  • Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12 has 46% less fat (2 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12 has 87% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Bolognaise has 27% more fiber (1.5 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Bolognaise has 73% more protein (4.5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12 has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Bolognaise

Pulpe de tomates et concentré de tomates 56%, viande 17,5% (porc, boeuf), eau, légumes (carottes 6%, oignons 3%), sucre, sel, amidon transformé de maïs, persil 0,3%, huile de tournesol, arômes, ail.

Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12

Pulpe de tomates avec morceaux 70% (tomates 49%, purée de tomates), oignons 9%, purée de tomates 8%, carottes 3,5%, sucre, huile de tournesol, sel, amidon, plantes aromatiques (dont persil 0,1%), extrait de légumes, ail, arôme naturel de laurier.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bolognaise or Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12?

Overall, Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12 has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pz sce tom cuis nat 425g f12 has less sugar: 5.3 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons