Comparison

Boisson riz et coco BIO 1L vs Boisson riz châtaigne avoine

Overall, Boisson riz châtaigne avoine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBoisson riz et coco BIO 1LBoisson riz châtaigne avoine
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 71 kcal 59 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 1.1 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0.2 g
Sugars 4.3 g 8.3 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 1 g 0.5 g
Protein 0.6 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedGluten, Nuts, Avoine

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Boisson riz châtaigne avoine has 17% fewer calories (59 kcal vs 71 kcal).
  • Boisson riz châtaigne avoine has 56% less fat (1.1 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Boisson riz châtaigne avoine has 83% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Boisson riz et coco BIO 1L has 48% less sugar (4.3 g vs 8.3 g).
  • Boisson riz et coco BIO 1L has 50% more fiber (1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Boisson riz châtaigne avoine lists: Gluten, Nuts, Avoine.

Ingredients

Boisson riz et coco BIO 1L

Eau, riz** 14%, purée de noix de coco** 2%, huile de tournesol**, protéines de pois**, sel, arôme naturel de noix de coco** 0,09%. **Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique.

Boisson riz châtaigne avoine

Eau, Purée de Châtaigne* (14 %), riz* (12 %), _avoine_* (2 %), Huile de tournesol* pressée à froid, Arôme naturel, Epaississant : farine de graines de caroube*, sel marin.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Boisson riz et coco BIO 1L or Boisson riz châtaigne avoine?

Overall, Boisson riz châtaigne avoine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Boisson riz châtaigne avoine has fewer calories: 59 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Boisson riz et coco BIO 1L has less sugar: 4.3 g versus 8.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons