Bloemenhoning vs Bloemenhoning
Overall, Bloemenhoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bloemenhoning | Bloemenhoning |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 325 kcal | 324 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 80.5 g | 80.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bloemenhoning has 90% more protein (4 g vs 0.4 g).
Ingredients
Bloemenhoning
100% honing
Bloemenhoning
Bloemenhoning. Gemengde EU en niet-EU honing. Waarschuwing: honing is niet geschikt voor kinderen onder 1 jaar. Gemiddelde
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bloemenhoning or Bloemenhoning?
Overall, Bloemenhoning has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bloemenhoning has fewer calories: 324 kcal versus 325 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bloemenhoning has less sugar: 80.5 g versus 80.5 g per 100 g.