Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei vs Secco Bianco
Overall, Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils A... | Secco Bianco |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 22 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.9 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei has no sugar, while Secco Bianco has 3.9 g.
- Only Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei
Agua, malta de cebada, lúpulo, extracto de lúpulo
Secco Bianco
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei or Secco Bianco?
Overall, Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei has fewer calories: 22 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bitburger 0.0 Premium Pils Alkoholfrei has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.