Comparison

Bisque de Langoustines vs Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues

Overall, Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBisque de LangoustinesBisque de LANGOUSTINES aux a...
Nutri-Score b —
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 48 kcal 15 kcal
Fat 2.5 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 1.2 g 0 g
Sugars 0.6 g 0 g
Salt 0.8 g —
Fiber 0.3 g —
Protein 5.3 g 1.4 g
Additives40
AllergensCrustaceans, Fish, Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues has 69% fewer calories (15 kcal vs 48 kcal).
  • Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues has 76% less fat (0.6 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues has 98% less saturated fat (0 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues has 97% less sugar (0 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Bisque de Langoustines has 74% more protein (5.3 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Only Bisque de Langoustines lists: Crustaceans, Fish, Milk, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Bisque de Langoustines

Eau, poissons, langoustines 12 %, (conservateur : E586, E223 (sulfites)), crème fraîche, concentré de tomates, oignons carottes, huile de tournesol, sel, ail, épaississants : gomme xanthane et guar, colorant : paprika, poireaux, vin blanc (sulfites), poivre, piment.

Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bisque de Langoustines or Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues?

Overall, Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues has fewer calories: 15 kcal versus 48 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bisque de LANGOUSTINES aux algues has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons