Comparison
Bioberger vs Tiroler Bergäse
Overall, Tiroler Bergäse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Bioberger
VorarlbergMilch · 180 g
Better choice 
Tiroler Bergäse
Plangger's Felsenkeller Käse · 200 g
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bioberger | Tiroler Bergäse |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 423 kcal | 423 kcal |
| Fat | 35 g | 35 g |
| Saturated fat | 23 g | 23 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 27 g | 27 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tiroler Bergäse has 20% less salt (1.6 g vs 2 g).
Ingredients
Bioberger
Milch, Speisesalz, Milchsäurebakterienkulturen, Labaustauschstoff.
Tiroler Bergäse
Milch, Steinsalz, Käsereikulturen, Lab.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bioberger or Tiroler Bergäse?
Overall, Tiroler Bergäse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bioberger has fewer calories: 423 kcal versus 423 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bioberger has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.