Bio nectar de pomme vs Apfelsaft 30%
Overall, Bio nectar de pomme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Bio nectar de pomme | Apfelsaft 30% |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 32 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 7.5 g | 7.2 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apfelsaft 30% has 94% less fat (0 g vs 0.5 g).
- Bio nectar de pomme has 94% more protein (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Bio nectar de pomme has the better Nutri-Score.
- Bio nectar de pomme is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Bio nectar de pomme
75% jus de pomme à base de concentré, eau, acidifiant : acide citrique.
Apfelsaft 30%
Wasser, Apfelsaft aus Apfelsaftkonzentrat, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; natürliches Apfelaroma mit anderen natürlichen Aromen, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio nectar de pomme or Apfelsaft 30%?
Overall, Bio nectar de pomme has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apfelsaft 30% has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 32 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Apfelsaft 30% has less sugar: 7.2 g versus 7.5 g per 100 g.