Bio-Glühwein rot vs Winzerschorle Sauer
Overall, Winzerschorle Sauer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Bio-Glühwein rot | Winzerschorle Sauer |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 45 kcal | 31 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | — |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | — |
| Sugars | 9 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.5 g | — |
| Additives | 1 | 3 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Winzerschorle Sauer has 31% fewer calories (31 kcal vs 45 kcal).
- Winzerschorle Sauer has 89% less sugar (1 g vs 9 g).
Ingredients
Bio-Glühwein rot
Rotwein (Trauben, Antioxidationsmittel: Schwefeldioxid), Invertzuckersirup, natürliches Gewürzaroma.
Winzerschorle Sauer
Weißwein (Trauben, Stabilisator: Metaweinsäure, Antioxidationsmittel: Sulfite), Wasser, Zucker, Kohlendioxid, Konservierungsstoff: Kaliumsorbat
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Glühwein rot or Winzerschorle Sauer?
Overall, Winzerschorle Sauer has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Winzerschorle Sauer has fewer calories: 31 kcal versus 45 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Winzerschorle Sauer has less sugar: 1 g versus 9 g per 100 g.