Bio-Almbutter vs Magarine 30%fett
Overall, Magarine 30%fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bio-Almbutter | Magarine 30%fett |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 730 kcal | 251 kcal |
| Fat | 82 g | 28 g |
| Saturated fat | 53.9 g | 5.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Magarine 30%fett has 66% fewer calories (251 kcal vs 730 kcal).
- Magarine 30%fett has 66% less fat (28 g vs 82 g).
- Magarine 30%fett has 90% less saturated fat (5.6 g vs 53.9 g).
- Magarine 30%fett has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bio-Almbutter
Sauerrahmbutter mit 82% Fett
Magarine 30%fett
Trinkwasser, pflanzliche Öle und Fette (13% Sonnenblumen, 6% Raps, 5% Leinsamen, 4% Palm), Emulgator (Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren), Speisesalz (0,1%), Säuerungsmittel (Citronensäure), Aromen, Vitamine (A, D, E), Farbstoff (Carotin).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bio-Almbutter or Magarine 30%fett?
Overall, Magarine 30%fett has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Magarine 30%fett has fewer calories: 251 kcal versus 730 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Magarine 30%fett has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.