Comparison

Belgian chocolate vegan fudge vs Luxury fudge Vanilla

Overall, Belgian chocolate vegan fudge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBelgian chocolate vegan fudg...Luxury fudge Vanilla
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 446 kcal 472 kcal
Fat 14 g 20 g
Saturated fat 8.3 g 14 g
Sugars 71 g 61 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.5 g 2.1 g
Additives11
AllergensNone listedMilk, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Belgian chocolate vegan fudge has 30% less fat (14 g vs 20 g).
  • Belgian chocolate vegan fudge has 41% less saturated fat (8.3 g vs 14 g).
  • Luxury fudge Vanilla has 14% less sugar (61 g vs 71 g).
  • Belgian chocolate vegan fudge has 85% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Luxury fudge Vanilla has 76% more protein (2.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Luxury fudge Vanilla lists: Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Belgian chocolate vegan fudge

sugar, glucose syrup, cocoa butter, brown sugar, golden syrup, cocoa mass (3.6%), demerara sugar, humectant: glycerine, natural vanilla flavouring, salt. ninın kakanhutter brauner

Luxury fudge Vanilla

Fudge med vanilje Ingredienser: Sukker*, vegetabilsk fett (palme, palmekjerne), glukosesirup, SKUMMETMELK - PULVER, salt, vann, emuleringsmiddel (E322 fra SOYA), naturlig vaniljearoma, Kan inneholde spor av egg, peanøtter, mandler og pistasjenøtter,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Belgian chocolate vegan fudge or Luxury fudge Vanilla?

Overall, Belgian chocolate vegan fudge has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Belgian chocolate vegan fudge has fewer calories: 446 kcal versus 472 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Luxury fudge Vanilla has less sugar: 61 g versus 71 g per 100 g.

More comparisons