Comparison
Beaujolais nouveau 2015 vs Beaujolais 2016
Overall, Beaujolais nouveau 2015 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beaujolais nouveau 2015 | Beaujolais 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 0 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beaujolais nouveau 2015 has no sugar, while Beaujolais 2016 has 1 g.
- Beaujolais nouveau 2015 has no salt, while Beaujolais 2016 has 1 g.
- Beaujolais 2016 has 100% more protein (1 g vs 0 g).
- Only Beaujolais nouveau 2015 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Beaujolais nouveau 2015
vin (_sulfites_)
Beaujolais 2016
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beaujolais nouveau 2015 or Beaujolais 2016?
Overall, Beaujolais nouveau 2015 has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beaujolais nouveau 2015 has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 1 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beaujolais nouveau 2015 has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Moulin à Vent - 2016 vs Beaujolais 2016
Beaujolais nouveau 2015 vs Moulin à Vent - 2016
Beaujolais nouveau 2015 vs Beaujolais Villages Nouv...
Morgon Montignat 2014 vs Beaujolais 2016
Beaujolais Villages Nouv... vs Beaujolais 2016
Beaujolais Nouveau 2015 vs Beaujolais 2016
Beaujolais AOC 2013 Bio... vs Beaujolais 2016
Beaujolais nouveau 2015 vs Beaujolais AOC 2013 Bio...