Comparison

Moulin à Vent - 2016 vs Beaujolais 2016

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientMoulin à Vent - 2016Beaujolais 2016
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 11 kcal 1 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.6 g 1 g
Salt 0 g 1 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 0.1 g 1 g
Additives00
AllergensSulphur dioxide and sulphitesNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Beaujolais 2016 has 91% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 11 kcal).
  • Moulin à Vent - 2016 has 38% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Moulin à Vent - 2016 has no salt, while Beaujolais 2016 has 1 g.
  • Beaujolais 2016 has 93% more protein (1 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Only Moulin à Vent - 2016 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Moulin à Vent - 2016

vin rouge

Beaujolais 2016

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Moulin à Vent - 2016 or Beaujolais 2016?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Beaujolais 2016 has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Moulin à Vent - 2016 has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons