Moulin à Vent - 2016 vs Beaujolais 2016
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Moulin à Vent - 2016 | Beaujolais 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 1 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beaujolais 2016 has 91% fewer calories (1 kcal vs 11 kcal).
- Moulin à Vent - 2016 has 38% less sugar (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Moulin à Vent - 2016 has no salt, while Beaujolais 2016 has 1 g.
- Beaujolais 2016 has 93% more protein (1 g vs 0.1 g).
- Only Moulin à Vent - 2016 lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Moulin à Vent - 2016
vin rouge
Beaujolais 2016
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Moulin à Vent - 2016 or Beaujolais 2016?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beaujolais 2016 has fewer calories: 1 kcal versus 11 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Moulin à Vent - 2016 has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 1 g per 100 g.