Beaujolais 2016 vs Beaujolais nouveau
Overall, Beaujolais nouveau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Beaujolais 2016 | Beaujolais nouveau |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 1 kcal | 0 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 1 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Beaujolais nouveau has no sugar, while Beaujolais 2016 has 1 g.
- Beaujolais nouveau has no salt, while Beaujolais 2016 has 1 g.
- Beaujolais 2016 has 100% more protein (1 g vs 0 g).
- Only Beaujolais nouveau lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Beaujolais 2016
Not available.
Beaujolais nouveau
vin (_sulfites_)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Beaujolais 2016 or Beaujolais nouveau?
Overall, Beaujolais nouveau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Beaujolais nouveau has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 1 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Beaujolais nouveau has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.