Comparison

Beaujolais 2016 vs Beaujolais nouveau

Overall, Beaujolais nouveau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBeaujolais 2016Beaujolais nouveau
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group — 3
Calories 1 kcal 0 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g —
Sugars 1 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 0 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 1 g 0 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedSulphur dioxide and sulphites

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Beaujolais nouveau has no sugar, while Beaujolais 2016 has 1 g.
  • Beaujolais nouveau has no salt, while Beaujolais 2016 has 1 g.
  • Beaujolais 2016 has 100% more protein (1 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Beaujolais nouveau lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.

Ingredients

Beaujolais 2016

Not available.

Beaujolais nouveau

vin (_sulfites_)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Beaujolais 2016 or Beaujolais nouveau?

Overall, Beaujolais nouveau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Beaujolais nouveau has fewer calories: 0 kcal versus 1 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Beaujolais nouveau has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons