Batonnets tropical 100% fruits vs Sorbet mangue
Overall, Batonnets tropical 100% fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Batonnets tropical 100% frui... | Sorbet mangue |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 115 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 17 g | 24 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 0.7 g |
| Protein | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Batonnets tropical 100% fruits has 57% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 115 kcal).
- Batonnets tropical 100% fruits has 29% less sugar (17 g vs 24 g).
- Batonnets tropical 100% fruits has 100% more protein (0.3 g vs 0 g).
- Batonnets tropical 100% fruits has the better Nutri-Score.
- Batonnets tropical 100% fruits is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Batonnets tropical 100% fruits
Jus de pomme à base de concentré 45%; ; jus d'ananas 18% ; ; purée de mangue 15% ; ; jus de pomme concentré 12,8% ; ; jusde fruit de la passion à base de concentré 9,2%.
Sorbet mangue
Eau, purée de mangue* 20%, sirop de riz (extrait de riz* 12.8%, eau), sucre de canne*, jus de citron concentré*, arôme naturel de mangue, gélifiants: pectine et gomme xanthane protéines de pois hydrolysées. * Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique
FAQ
Which is healthier: Batonnets tropical 100% fruits or Sorbet mangue?
Overall, Batonnets tropical 100% fruits has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Batonnets tropical 100% fruits has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 115 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Batonnets tropical 100% fruits has less sugar: 17 g versus 24 g per 100 g.